The interim is when I get to step back and think about how to provide the best possible service as a nonpartisan analyst to the Maryland General Assembly. These are my personal reflections—not the views of the Department of Legislative Services—and an attempt to deepen my understanding of the process we support. Writing these reflections should also help me keep up my practice during the interim.

What Is a Fiscal and Policy Note?

In Maryland, a fiscal and policy note (most often referred to as a fiscal note) estimates the impact of proposed legislation on State and local revenues and expenditures for the year the bill takes effect and the following four fiscal years. They are prepared by the nonpartisan staff of the Department of Legislative Services (DLS).

Under State Government Article § 2-1505, a standing committee may not vote on a bill unless a fiscal note accompanies it. The only exception is when the committee chair certifies that prompt action is required. In that case, a hearing may proceed, and the fiscal note must be prepared as soon as possible afterward.

Though designed primarily for legislators and staff, fiscal notes must also be reasonably available for public inspection and retained for three years. DLS meets this requirement by posting them online through the Maryland General Assembly website. In practice, fiscal notes are frequently read by advocates, journalists, and members of the public—often more so than the bills themselves. Their structure and language are designed to be accessible, providing context that plain bill text may lack.

Despite popular belief, fiscal notes are not binding, but they are influential. They are trusted because they are developed by neutral, nonpartisan staff using the best available information at the time. A fiscal note can clarify the cost of a proposal, highlight technical drafting issues, and influence the success or failure of legislation. When a bill fails to advance, members or advocates sometimes say it “had a fiscal note,” shorthand for saying the estimated cost or uncertainty may have been too high.

DLS also produces revised fiscal notes when bills are amended or enrolled. These must be sent to committee chairs in both chambers (if applicable), the Secretary of the Senate or Chief Clerk of the House (if in custody), and the primary bill sponsor. Revised notes are posted to the website as soon as they are finalized.

Core Components of a Fiscal and Policy Note

1. Bill Summary

Fiscal notes contain two summaries:

  • Short Summary (on page one): Conveys the core purpose of the bill, effective date (if not October 1), and any required reports. It aims for clarity and accuracy while avoiding legalese.
  • Long Summary (in the body): Expands on details that didn’t fit in the short summary. This includes more nuanced provisions and often provides needed structure to understand complex bills.

2. Fiscal Summary

The fiscal summary includes a brief explanation of:

  • State Effect
  • Local Effect
  • Small Business Effect

If there’s a quantifiable impact on State revenues or expenditures, a five-year fiscal table (“the box”) is included. State or local mandates are noted in bold.

3. Current Law

This section summarizes the relevant existing law. The summary should match the level of detail in the bill summary, neither overwhelming nor too sparse.

4. Background

Background sections appear in administration or departmental bills. These often include relevant statistics, policy history, or data that provide context for the bill’s purpose.

5. Fiscal Impact Sections

State Fiscal Impact

Details the bill’s projected fiscal effect by fund type and agency. Expenditures and revenues are generally discussed separately unless the issues are intertwined. Analysts describe:

  • What changes drive the impact
  • How estimates were calculated
  • Any assumptions or unknowns

Under § 2-1505, agencies are required to promptly provide data upon request, but final estimates are made by DLS analysts. Sources are listed at the end of the note.

Local Fiscal Impact

This section mirrors the state fiscal impact, estimating changes to local revenues and expenditures. It is typically a separate section but may be combined when impacts cannot be cleanly separated.

Small Business Impact

Summarizes any material effects on small businesses, if applicable.

Additional Comments

Used sparingly, this section flags issues such as ambiguous drafting, conflicts with current law, or implementation barriers that don’t fall neatly into the fiscal analysis.

What Fiscal Notes Don’t Cover

Fiscal notes do not estimate the impact on individual residents or model secondary effects (like economic multipliers or indirect behavioral changes) unless those can be reasonably and directly linked to the bill.

Conclusion

Fiscal and policy notes are one of the most import tools in the legislative process. They serve as a neutral lens through which to assess the fiscal and policy consequences of proposed legislation. Their strength lies in their structure, clarity, and impartiality. When written well, they guide decisions, spark better questions, and provide a roadmap for implementation.

I have been very busy recently. But today I decided to play around with the new AI software to see what type of information it can give about education policy.

With the Supreme Court set to hear arguments about President Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan today, I have been thinking about education court cases.

So I asked: “What are the top 10 Supreme Court cases related to education?”

Here are ten Supreme Court cases that have had a significant impact on education in the United States:

  1. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): This landmark case declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, paving the way for desegregation efforts throughout the country.
  2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969): This case affirmed that students have a First Amendment right to free speech, even while in school.
  3. New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985): This case addressed the issue of students’ Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures in the context of school searches.
  4. Plyler v. Doe (1982): This case established that states cannot deny education to undocumented immigrant children.
  5. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003): This case upheld the use of affirmative action in college admissions as a way to achieve diversity.
  6. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988): This case clarified the extent of a school’s authority to regulate student speech in school-sponsored activities, such as school newspapers.
  7. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007): This case addressed the use of race in school assignment plans, striking down certain plans that used race as a factor.
  8. Board of Education v. Earls (2002): This case addressed the constitutionality of drug testing students who participate in extracurricular activities.
  9. Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000): This case addressed the constitutionality of school-sponsored prayer at public high school football games.
  10. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002): This case upheld the constitutionality of school voucher programs, which allow public funds to be used for private school tuition.

Overall, I think these are solid picks, but I will have to do more research to decide if these are my top 10 picks. I think that generating a list of topics to research more deeply is an appropriate use of this technology, although I would have to carefully check any summaries.